Click here  ::TRADITIONAL T'AI ARTS IN CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVE
Click here  ::RUNNING WITH THE SHARKS Click here  ::BUDDHISM IN CHINA Click here  ::TALIBAN, THE
       

DEVELOPMENT AND DOMINION: INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF CAMBODIA, VIETNAM AND LAOS
  DEVELOPMENT AND DOMINION: INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF CAMBODIA, VIETNAM AND LAOS
  By : Bourdier, Frederic
  Bangkok, 2009
  502 pp., 24 pp., illus, 7 pp. maps, 150 x 210 mm., pbk.  Weight  0.700 Kg
  Code :  E22632     Price :  US$42

Order book click....

      Please look in   :: List  Cambodia

      Bourdier, Frédéric; Development and Dominion: Indigenous Peoples of Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos This book deals with prevailing development ideologies and their impacts on indigenous societies with a particular focus on Cambodia, Laos and the central highlands of Vietnam. It reinforces the idea that development, as it is conceptualized and implemented, radically undermines local communities' ability to control the parameters of inevitable social and material changes. The more development projects choose new objectives and operating models the more the rhetoric and practices remain the same. One of the strengths of the presentations is to convincingly advocate closer ethnographic understanding in order to make any sort of cross-cultural negotiations and mutual engagement meaningful. This imperative is known to some extent, but it needs to be implemented more vigorously to make it more persuasive. As a result, anthropology of development rather than development anthropology is proposed. The essential difference lies in the point of engagement. Development anthropology seeks to do development better, by trying to mitigate the effects of top-down programs and allow some breathing space for local people to express their input. Anthropology of development, on the other hand, questions the very operating premises of contemporary development. This point is very much in line with the intent of the current book, even if some of the authors in this book opt to challenge this position, being convinced that it is not the best strategy to offer radical critiques that few people in the world of development listen to, and preferring to work within the world of development programs in the hope of providing salient lessons and constructive models.